At what point do fundamentalists misconstrue the putative tenets of their religions or dogmas and cross the line, misrepresenting their institution?
At which point are they perfectly within them? How far does a drive towards social vengeance, compiled with a hermeneutical revision, go towards permanently realigning the egregore or corpus of the religion towards another paradigm?
A review of the abrahamic faiths, their scriptures, and moderates , show that a lil bit of belief and guidance can be good for some people, or at least in lieu of deep education and logic, can control them.
Can we hold the Codified and Institutionalized (modern) religions for the crimes of heterodox heretics? What do you think?
Ravana, al-Awlaki and the Hijacking of Religion
Mystic Politics mission is to instigate debate on politics, religion, and science towards a more informed society. Our goals are increasing the authority of alternative media and citizen journalism- and to spotlight political corruption, government conspiracies, religion in politics, and the dichotomy of science and faith.
Friday, October 7, 2011
Ravana, al-Awlaki and the Hijacking of Religion
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment